SearchCZ Česká verze

PEPs and country risk

Countries of the client, funds origin and transaction

Assessing actual geographic connections rather than a blanket citizenship score.

Redakce eAML.czLegal position: 2026-10-04Editorial check: 2026-10-04

Geographic risk is more than a citizenship field. Consider clients, beneficial owners, funds origins, banks, activities, beneficiaries and end use. Each connection may carry different legal and risk implications.

Build a map rather than one label

For individuals, separate nationality, residence, actual activity and economic connections. A company’s registered office may differ from its main operations. The payment account may be elsewhere than the funds’ origin. Record the economic source and transaction link; bank location alone does not explain sale proceeds, business income or other sources.

For company formation or office provision, assess planned activities and relevant owners. Czech addresses and new Czech accounts do not establish that all activities and funds are Czech. Map recipients, transit and onward use in cross-border transactions. Explain data requirements through relevant connections rather than requesting every country in the client’s life.

    Assign each source its legal significance

    Distinguish FATF evidence, the effective EU high-risk-country list and sanctions regimes. Czech Section 9a assesses relevant country of origin or transaction connections. One automated score cannot replace statutory triggers. A country outside public lists may still present individual risk through other evidenced circumstances.

    Assess the credibility and importance of connections. Citizenship without other relevant facts is not a universal service ban. Unsupported funds-origin claims differ from residence in a country. Mark unknown information and the plan to obtain it; empty fields must not automatically generate the lowest risk.

      The map changes during a relationship

      Update the map after changes in owners, activities, banks, payment routes or target markets. Explain impacts on measures and retain historical versions. New transactions may differ from onboarding connections. Do not rely on a years-old questionnaire where commercial facts materially changed.

        Example of a Czech company with foreign links

        A new Czech company requests an office address and gives a Czech account. Its owner operates elsewhere and funds reportedly come from a business sale in a third country. Record links separately and determine how they relate to the service and planned activity. A Czech account may facilitate tracing payment but does not explain its economic source. Choose questions based on the flow, not a foreign-client label.

        If the company later operates in another country or receives payments from different entities, assess the effect on the original assessment. Not every minor change requires complete onboarding again, but material change needs appropriate review and explanation. Record information source, significance and supplements. Address genuinely unknown source of funds separately rather than hiding it behind a low score for the Czech registered office.

          Practical steps

          1. Separate geographic connections.
          2. Establish evidence and significance.
          3. Check relevant lists and statutory triggers.
          4. Set update triggers.

          Illustrative scenario

          A Czech company is financed by selling a foreign business. The office assesses evidenced funds origin, owners and payment route instead of an automatic Czech score.

          When the situation differs

          A Czech bank account overwrites all other geographic connections with Czechia.

          What to document

          • Map and evidence of material connections.
          • Effective list and reasons for measures.
          • Change history.

          Common pitfalls

          • Blanket refusal based on citizenship.
          • Treating an unknown country as low risk.

          Frequently asked questions

          Is the registered-office country enough?

          Not for a complete assessment. Add actual activities, material ownership links and funds origins/destinations according to risk.

          Put this guidance into practice

          Choose a record for the step you are working on. Adapt it to your profession and actual case.

          Complete client information online

          Where to go next

          Sources and legal references

          1. Zákon č. 253/2008 Sb., znění od 11. 1. 2026 ↗
            § 4 odst. 5, § 8 odst. 8, § 9, § 9a, § 15 odst. 2, § 54 odst. 8 · accessed 2026-10-04
          2. Evropská komise: Vysoce rizikové třetí země ↗
            seznam EU a data účinnosti; akty 2016/1675, 2026/46 a 2026/83 · accessed 2026-10-04
          3. FATF: Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring, 19 June 2026 ↗
            význam zvýšeného sledování a risk-based approach · accessed 2026-10-04

          Editorial work and source checks are not independent legal approval of your particular process. Compare the conditions and exceptions with your own circumstances.