When the obligation applies
- Operating gambling under Czech gambling legislation.
Exceptions and important distinctions
- Offline lotteries and bingo, and raffles, are excluded from this category.
- The special EUR 2,000 due diligence trigger does not replace checks at establishment of a relationship or on suspicion.
- Read the category with section 2(3): the activity must form part of the business, subject to statutory exceptions for non-business legal entities, lawyer partners and the specified trust activity.
From first engagement to retention
Read this workflow with the scope and exceptions for this profession. Evidence of a measure follows its actual performance.
1. Before starting: verify scope
Record the actual service, parties and why it falls within the scope above. Assess exceptions for each measure, rather than applying them to the entire client relationship.
2. While providing the service: apply sector steps
- Determine the game type and distribution channel.
- Configure player registration and ongoing monitoring.
- Assess connected operations and unusual payment patterns.
When the service, party or relevant circumstances change, revisit the affected step. This profession’s special regime takes precedence over a generic checklist.
3. Closure: document the outcome under the applicable regime
- Authorisation, game rules and channel
- Player and payment records
- Reasons for risk measures
Determine which records to retain and under what legal basis. For a customer of an obliged entity this concerns cooperation, not taking over the provider’s duties.
§ 2 odst. 1 písm. c); § 9 odst. 1 písm. a) bod 5Supervision and legal basis
FAÚ and the Customs Administration under section 35.
§ 2 odst. 1 písm. c); § 9 odst. 1 písm. a) bod 5 ↗
AML monetary thresholds: value, currency and related transactions
Separate identification, due diligence and obliged-entity thresholds, including currency conversion and aggregation.
Read article →New customers: from initial information to documented due diligence
A practical onboarding timeline from the legal trigger through verification, decision and records.
Read article →Suspicious transactions: internal escalation and cooperation
How to escalate specific suspicion, preserve the timeline and respond to FAÚ requests.
Read article →