SearchCZ Česká verze

Working template

Sanctions match assessment

Document why a match remains possible or has been distinguished.

For: Businesses assessing sanctions risk

No name match is not transaction authorisation.

A4 for printing · Word for further editing · created in this browser

Before use

Check current sector rules in the related articles. Add accountable roles, specific sources and steps actually performed. Do not enter unnecessary personal data.

How to complete the template

  1. Original query, name variants, date and time

    Retain the exact query, aliases and time. If results are truncated or a source is stale, do not record “no match”.

  2. Sources, versions/snapshots, legal acts and freshness

    For each list record publisher, URL, version and check date. Link the record to the full JSON report.

  3. Identifiers compared and their provenance

    Compare available birth date, nationality, address and other identifiers. A similar name alone is not decisive.

  4. Uncertainties; ownership, control and other prohibitions

    Explain exclusion or a continuing possible match. An unknown identifier is not contradictory evidence proving a different person.

  5. Human conclusion, reasoning, accountable role and next step

    Assess the applicable sanctions instrument, ownership, control and prohibited activity. Follow that instrument and reporting duties for relevant findings.

Illustrative use

MODEL SAN-01: name matches, list has no birth date. Conclusion: absent date cannot exclude a match; possible match remains open. Accountable role requests further identifiers.

A4 for printing · Word for further editing · created in this browser

When the case is uncertain

Available evidence does not exclude the match? Retain “possible match”, arrange assessment and do not present a negative result.

Legal basis: zákon 69/2006 Sb., zejména § 10; konkrétní sankční nařízení

V06-2026-10-04 · Redakce eAML.cz

Related guidance